Kawabata’s Snow Country: How One Sentence Crosses a Border
There are sentences that do not so much begin a novel as displace the reader from one country into another. They are not introductions. They are thresholds.
Yasunari Kawabata (1899–1972) wrote one of them in 1935, revised it for over a decade, and let it stand at the gate of the book that would, in 1968, make him the first Japanese laureate of the Nobel Prize in Literature. The book is Snow Country. The sentence is this:
“The train came out of the long tunnel into the snow country.”
— Yasunari Kawabata, Snow Country (1948), trans. Edward G. Seidensticker
In Japanese, the line is even stranger, even quieter: Kokkyō no nagai tonneru o nukeru to yukiguni de atta. Yoru no soko ga shiroku natta. — The long border’s tunnel having been passed through, it was snow country. The bottom of the night had turned white.
Readers who have never opened the novel still carry this sentence somewhere in the back of the mind, the way one carries the memory of a window seat on a train one rode long ago. Why does it stay? Why has this single line outlived its century, its translations, even most of its readers?
The Sentence That Refuses a Subject
Begin with what Kawabata does not write. He does not write “The train came out of the tunnel.” He does not write “Shimamura looked out and saw the snow.” In the original, there is no train, no man, no eye. The Japanese sentence has no grammatical subject at all. Something passes through a long tunnel at the border, and on the other side, it was snow country.
This is not a stylistic eccentricity. It is a metaphysical decision. By withholding the subject, Kawabata refuses to tell us who is moving and who is being moved. The reader is not given a seat behind the protagonist’s eyes; the reader is the passage itself. We do not watch someone enter the snow country. We become the act of entering.
Seidensticker, faced with the impossibility of an English sentence without a subject, gave us “The train came out.” It is a beautiful translation, and a small betrayal. The train arrives. In Japanese, only the snow country arrives, while the one who would name it is held back, just behind the page.
Notice, then, the second sentence: Yoru no soko ga shiroku natta. The bottom of the night had turned white. Night, in Kawabata, is not a darkness above us; it is a vessel with a floor. And the floor has gone pale. We are inside something we cannot see the edges of, and the only thing we know is that down there, where the bottom should be, the dark has changed colour.
The Long Tunnel as a Border of Worlds
The tunnel in question is the Shimizu Tunnel, completed in 1931, which let the Jōetsu Line pierce the spine of the Mikuni mountains and connect Tokyo’s side of the country to the heavy-snow province of Niigata. Kawabata wrote his sentence within four years of that engineering feat. He had taken the train. He had felt the lurch from one weather into another.
But realism is the least interesting layer here. The word he uses, kokkyō, literally means “national border,” though here it refers to the old provincial frontier. Kawabata could have used kunizakai, a softer word for the same thing. He chose the heavier ideogram. The reader steps into the novel through a border that is not quite a border, between two countries that are not quite countries, on a train that has no driver and a passenger who has no name.
What lies on the far side of this passage is not merely Niigata. It is a region of the soul that the daylight world has agreed not to discuss: a place where a married Tokyo aesthete will spend a few snowed-in nights with a hot-spring geisha named Komako, will love her in a manner that is also a way of not loving her, and will leave. The tunnel is the membrane between the world that calculates and the world that simply happens.
The sentence’s greatness lies in this: it does not describe the crossing. It performs it. By the time the reader has finished the second clause, she is already on the other side, and she did not feel herself move.
What the Sentence Inherits, What It Refuses
Kawabata had behind him the long Japanese tradition of mono no aware, the gentle ache at the passing of things, and the aesthetic principle of yohā, the lingering resonance after a sound has stopped. He had also lived through the catastrophe of the Pacific War and the humiliation of occupation. Snow Country was begun before that war and finished after it. The 1948 final text is a postwar book disguised as a prewar one.
Read in that light, the opening sentence becomes more than a beautiful threshold. It is an act of refusal. While the rest of literate Japan was being asked, in 1948, to take up the language of national reckoning, of ideology, of explicit subjects who do explicit things, Kawabata begins his masterpiece by erasing the subject altogether. Something passes through. Something has turned white. No one is in charge. No one is responsible. The political grammar of the moment is suspended, and in its place a quieter grammar of passage and weather is offered.
One can criticize this. Ōe Kenzaburō, the second Japanese Nobel laureate, would later argue, in his own 1994 lecture, that Kawabata’s aesthetic of beautiful Japan risked sealing literature off from the historical wound. The criticism has weight. A sentence that lets the subject vanish into snow can also let responsibility vanish into snow.
And yet the sentence keeps its strange honesty. It does not pretend that the world it enters is a world of agency and clear borders. It admits, at the very first breath of the book, that the things we cross are longer and darker than we are, and that what waits on the other side will be there with or without our naming.
Why the Sentence Will Not Let Us Go
Every reader who returns to Kawabata returns, in part, for this opening. But the deeper reason has less to do with literary history than with a recognition the sentence triggers in the body. We have all been, at some point, the unnamed thing that passes through the long tunnel. We have all surfaced, on the other side of an illness, a love, a decade, into a country whose floor had quietly turned white while we were inside the dark.
The sentence does not ask us to identify with a character. It asks us to remember the texture of crossings we cannot narrate. The hospital corridor whose end we cannot recall reaching. The weeks after a parent’s death when the colour of ordinary afternoons was different and we did not know who had changed it. The morning we realized the marriage was over and the kitchen light looked unfamiliar, as if the bottom of something had gone pale overnight.
This is what makes the line an inheritance rather than a museum piece. Kawabata gave us a grammar for the passages of life that have no protagonist, only a movement and a weather. The opening of Snow Country is not a sentence about a train. It is a sentence about the way arrivals sometimes precede the arriver.
A Reader’s Threshold
To anyone who has ever found themselves on the far side of a long passage, blinking at a landscape that had already changed without consulting them, this sentence is already familiar. You have been inside it before you read it.
The question Kawabata leaves at the gate of his novel is not literary. It is this: when the next tunnel comes — and another always comes — will you require that the world wait for you to name yourself before it turns white, or will you let the snow country be there first, and meet it without a subject, without a story, with only the willingness to have arrived?
Some sentences ask you to read them. This one asks you to cross.
Post a Comment